Re: Mean Spirited Review
Gee, other than his review of the TRULY subjective stuff like styling I kinda agree with his review.
OK, so he doesn't like the look of the exterior or the color matched interiors.......hey, that's a matter of OPINION.......as said earlier everyone's got one.
Let's be brutally honest here, beyond his dopey review of the cars appearance, most of the rest is pretty spot on.
Love the car but it is "SOFT" ......you want performance you best look else-where.
I think this reviewer, like many other people who don't now or never did get these cars, is suffering from a mis-understanding of the car's appeal.
It's supposed to be "Soft" and "Comfortable".......sure more power would have been a welcome development but that's not nearly as important as keeping the car comfortable and "relaxed" as Ford described it.
He's DEAD on in his assessment of Thunderbird heritage too.
The cars in between the original two-seater and the new two-seaters really were so different that they should have had a different name. I won't go as far as he did and call 'em all awful some were pretty cool but they just weren't the same car as the 2 seater.
Personally I have to admit........it has always been something I've thought of when-ever I look at the SST shift in my '04.........why didn't ford give us the option of a 5 or 6 speed manual and wouldn't a super-charged version of the base V8 have really been a COOL throw back to the original Super Charged T Bird of the 50s?!!!!!
Gee, other than his review of the TRULY subjective stuff like styling I kinda agree with his review.
OK, so he doesn't like the look of the exterior or the color matched interiors.......hey, that's a matter of OPINION.......as said earlier everyone's got one.
Let's be brutally honest here, beyond his dopey review of the cars appearance, most of the rest is pretty spot on.
Love the car but it is "SOFT" ......you want performance you best look else-where.
I think this reviewer, like many other people who don't now or never did get these cars, is suffering from a mis-understanding of the car's appeal.
It's supposed to be "Soft" and "Comfortable".......sure more power would have been a welcome development but that's not nearly as important as keeping the car comfortable and "relaxed" as Ford described it.
He's DEAD on in his assessment of Thunderbird heritage too.
The cars in between the original two-seater and the new two-seaters really were so different that they should have had a different name. I won't go as far as he did and call 'em all awful some were pretty cool but they just weren't the same car as the 2 seater.
Personally I have to admit........it has always been something I've thought of when-ever I look at the SST shift in my '04.........why didn't ford give us the option of a 5 or 6 speed manual and wouldn't a super-charged version of the base V8 have really been a COOL throw back to the original Super Charged T Bird of the 50s?!!!!!
Comment