Welcome to thunderbirdnest.com! TBN is the web's best site for enthusiasts of 2002, 2003, 2004
and 2005 Ford Thunderbirds (retrobirds). Discussion forums, technical forums, production
data, photos, modifications, performance enhancements, accessories and more.
Much of the content on TBN can only be accessed by registered
users who are logged in. You must also be logged in to post. There is no cost to join; it's
all free! If you don't have an account
register for one and
join the Retro T-Bird fun today!
Does anyone know what percnt of 55-57 all Fords were 55-57 t-birds and what percent of 02-05 all Fords were 02-05 retro birds?
ewclement
Ford production for the years '55, '56,'57 as follows.
1955 production cars, 1,435,002 (includes t'birds)
1956 "" "" , 1,392,847 (includes t'birds)
1957 "" "" , 1,655,068 (includes t'birds)
note: these numbers do not include the Lincoln devision.
T'Bird numbers were given in post #2, so you can do the math.
Do not have numbers for the '02 to '05 Ford production yet
MartinB..
Check me if I am wrong---the new T-birds were mamufactured in the WIXOM ASS PLANT which had been a LINCOLN PLANT. I have no idea where the 50`s birds were built??
I WILL GIVE THIS A TRY, FROM MEMORY, THUNDERBIRDS WERE BUILT:
55-57 DEARBORN ASSEMBLY PLANT
58-76 WIXOM ASSEMBLY PLANT
77-79 CHICAGO AND LOS ANGLES ASSEMBLY PLANTS
80-82 CHICAGO AND LORAIN ASSEMBLY PLANTS
83-97 LORAIN ASSEMBLY PLANT
02-05 WIXOM ASSEMBLY PLANT
So, back to the original question from 'ewclement',
""" Does anyone know what percent of 55-57 all Fords were 55-57 t-birds and what percent of 02-05 all Fords were 02-05 retro birds? """
For 1955, if my calculations are correct, The percentage of '55 Birds of the total 1955 Ford production would be 1.13%. For '56 it would be 1.12% and for '57 it would be 1.29%.
Still trying to find total Ford production for the 2002, 03, 04, and 05 years. I would venture to guess that total Ford production for these years was much higher than back in the 50's, so the percentage of Retro Birds would probably be much lower than the 'baby birds'. Does anyone have those numbers.
Comment